Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
corteximplant.com is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
CORTEX IMPLANT - an international cyberpunk'ish LGBTQIA+ friendly Fediverse instance for edgerunners, netrunners and cyberpunks and all who want to become one.

Administered by:

Server stats:

237
active users

corteximplant.com: AboutStatusPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.4.0-alpha.4+glitch.cortex

#copyright

50 posts38 participants5 posts today
Dissent Doe :cupofcoffee:<p>Somewhat OT, but may be of interest/relevance to a number of folks:</p><p>" In a landmark opinion over the copyrightability of works created by artificial intelligence, a D.C. Circuit panel ruled on Tuesday that human authorship is required for copyright protection.</p><p>As AI technology quickly advances and intertwines with human creations, the unanimous opinion lays down the first precedential marker over who or what is the author of work created solely by artificial intelligence under copyright law."</p><p><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/dc-circuit-rules-ai-generated-work-ineligible-for-copyright/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">courthousenews.com/dc-circuit-</span><span class="invisible">rules-ai-generated-work-ineligible-for-copyright/</span></a></p><p>Direct link to opinion: <br><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/thaler-v-perlmutter-dc-circuit-opinion.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">courthousenews.com/wp-content/</span><span class="invisible">uploads/2025/03/thaler-v-perlmutter-dc-circuit-opinion.pdf</span></a></p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/ArtificialIntelligence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ArtificialIntelligence</span></a></p>
Glyn Moody<p>Do <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> robo-authors qualify for <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a>? It's still no, says appeals court - <a href="https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/18/appeals_court_says_ai_authors/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theregister.com/2025/03/18/app</span><span class="invisible">eals_court_says_ai_authors/</span></a> "Computer scientist Stephen Thaler again told his 'Creativity Machine' can't earn a ©"</p>
Matthew Rimmer<p>Denial of Copyright to AI 'Author' Affirmed by D.C. Circuit <a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/human-authorship-required-to-register-copyright-d-c-cir-rules" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/h</span><span class="invisible">uman-authorship-required-to-register-copyright-d-c-cir-rules</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/art" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>art</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/authorship" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>authorship</span></a></p>
Matthew Rimmer<p>Do AI robo-authors qualify for copyright? It's still no, says appeals court <a href="https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/18/appeals_court_says_ai_authors/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theregister.com/2025/03/18/app</span><span class="invisible">eals_court_says_ai_authors/</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/authorship" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>authorship</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/art" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>art</span></a></p>
Matthew Rimmer<p>US appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creator <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">reuters.com/world/us/us-appeal</span><span class="invisible">s-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/</span></a></p><p>Decision of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit <a href="https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2025/03/23-5233.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinio</span><span class="invisible">ns/docs/2025/03/23-5233.pdf</span></a></p><p><a href="https://aus.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/authorship" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>authorship</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/art" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>art</span></a></p>
Nonilex<p>The <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a> also refers to other elements that can’t be attributed to a <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/machine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>machine</span></a>, Millet said, when it requires an <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/author" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>author</span></a>’s “signature” to transfer, talks about co-authors’ “intention,” &amp; refers to an author’s “nationality or domicile.”</p><p>“Machines do not have property, traditional human lifespans, family members, domiciles, nationalities, mentes reae, or signatures,” Millet said, later adding that “the <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> Act makes no sense if an ‘author’ is not a human being.”</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/IntellectualProperty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IntellectualProperty</span></a></p>
Nonilex<p>Millet wrote that the text of the <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> Act of 1976, “taken as a whole, is best read as making humanity a necessary condition for authorship.” That <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a> treats copyright as a heritable <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/property" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>property</span></a> right, suggesting an entity that can’t own property or have heirs can’t be an <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/author" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>author</span></a>. It also couches copyright terms to a <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/human" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>human</span></a> lifespan, she noted.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/IntellectualProperty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IntellectualProperty</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/ThalerVPerlmutter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ThalerVPerlmutter</span></a></p>
Nonilex<p>The panel declined to rule more broadly on whether or when creating an <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> or prompting it could give rise to <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> protection, instead simply rejecting the concept of entirely autonomous authorship. It also said it didn’t need to reach the Copyright Office’s argument that the constitution itself requires <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/human" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>human</span></a> authorship.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/IntellectualProperty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IntellectualProperty</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/ThalerVPerlmutter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ThalerVPerlmutter</span></a></p>
Nonilex<p>The opinion by Circuit Judge Patricia A. Millett lays down the first precedential marker regarding how <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a> treats works created by <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a>. While it sided w/the US Copyright Office’s operating position by finding <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/human" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>human</span></a> authorship is required for registration, it could create or reinforce perceptions in creative industries that AI’s contributions to a work represent unprotectable creative choices that can be freely copied.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/IntellectualProperty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IntellectualProperty</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/ThalerVPerlmutter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ThalerVPerlmutter</span></a></p>
Nonilex<p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Human" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Human</span></a> authorship is required for <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> protection, a DC Circuit panel ruled in a landmark opinion that represents a setback for a push to award <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/IntellectualProperty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IntellectualProperty</span></a> protections to <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> creations.<br>Computer scientist Stephen Thaler argued a copyright should be registered to his AI program for 2D art titled “A Recent Entrance to Paradise.”But copyright protects human creation, &amp; Thaler waived his alt argument that he created the work through creating the…program…</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a><br><a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/human-authorship-required-to-register-copyright-d-c-cir-rules" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/h</span><span class="invisible">uman-authorship-required-to-register-copyright-d-c-cir-rules</span></a></p>
Nonilex<p>The DC Circuit's decision in <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/ThalerVPerlmutter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ThalerVPerlmutter</span></a> is out, ruling that <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a> requires that <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/authors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>authors</span></a> be <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/human" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>human</span></a>, not <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a>, reasoning to this conclusion from the structure of the copyright statute (e.g., duration is based on the lifetime of the author)</p><p><a href="https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2025/03/23-5233.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinio</span><span class="invisible">ns/docs/2025/03/23-5233.pdf</span></a></p><p>via NYU Law’s Jeanne Fromer </p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/IntellectualProperty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IntellectualProperty</span></a></p>
Jonathan Bailey<p>Users report that Google's new AI model, Gemini 2.0 Flash, is exceptionally good at removing watermarks. Here's why it isn't a major shift.</p><p><a href="https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2025/03/18/why-ai-watermark-removal-is-not-a-game-changer/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">plagiarismtoday.com/2025/03/18</span><span class="invisible">/why-ai-watermark-removal-is-not-a-game-changer/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/Google" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Google</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/Gemini" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Gemini</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/Watermark" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Watermark</span></a></p>
Miguel Afonso Caetano<p>"The AI landscape is in danger of being dominated by large companies with deep pockets. These big names are in the news almost daily. But they’re far from the only ones – there are dozens of AI companies with fewer than 10 employees trying to build something new in a particular niche. </p><p>This bill demands that creators of any AI model–even a two-person company or a hobbyist tinkering with a small software build– identify copyrighted materials used in training. That requirement will be incredibly onerous, even if limited just to works registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. The registration system is a cumbersome beast at best–neither machine-readable nor accessible, it’s more like a card catalog than a database–that doesn’t offer information sufficient to identify all authors of a work, much less help developers to reliably match works in a training set to works in the system.</p><p>Even for major tech companies, meeting these new obligations would be a daunting task. For a small startup, throwing on such an impossible requirement could be a death sentence. If A.B. 412 becomes law, these smaller players will be forced to devote scarce resources to an unworkable compliance regime instead of focusing on development and innovation. The risk of lawsuits—potentially from copyright trolls—would discourage new startups from even attempting to enter the field."</p><p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/03/californias-ab-412-bill-could-crush-startups-and-cement-big-tech-ai-monopoly" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">eff.org/deeplinks/2025/03/cali</span><span class="invisible">fornias-ab-412-bill-could-crush-startups-and-cement-big-tech-ai-monopoly</span></a></p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/USA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>USA</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/California" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>California</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/GenerativeAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GenerativeAI</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AITraining" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AITraining</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/FairUse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FairUse</span></a></p>
Paul Keller<p>We have just launched the website for the CommonsDB project where we are documenting our work on building a public registry for <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/PublicDomain" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PublicDomain</span></a> and openly licensed works: </p><p><a href="https://www.commonsdb.org" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">commonsdb.org</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> </p><p>If you are interested in <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> registries &amp; want to follow our work you can subscribe to our newsletter.</p>
dalonso<p>Ben Stiller, Mark Ruffalo and More Than 400 Hollywood Names Urge Trump to Not Let AI Companies ‘Exploit’ Copyrighted Works</p><p><a href="https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/hollywood-urges-trump-block-ai-exploit-copyrights-1236339750/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">variety.com/2025/digital/news/</span><span class="invisible">hollywood-urges-trump-block-ai-exploit-copyrights-1236339750/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a></p>
Dave Rahardja<p>Sad to say, I think I agree with the EFF’s position here. Those of you who follow me know that I’m almost vehemently against <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a>, especially in the way they are deployed today, which impoverishes humanity.</p><p>But <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> enforcement is the wrong way to curtail this phenomenon. The damage is not done because of the way AI is trained, but in how it is wielded. Make no mistake: using copyright to limit what AI can train on won’t stop AI; it will enrich companies who own a ton of copyrighted materials as they *further abuse* copyright laws to extract money from the AI industry.</p><p>I wrote about this some time ago here: <a href="https://www.humancode.us/2024/05/15/copyright-ai.html" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">humancode.us/2024/05/15/copyri</span><span class="invisible">ght-ai.html</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@eff/114180299139460854" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">mastodon.social/@eff/114180299</span><span class="invisible">139460854</span></a></p>
Wen<p><a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/Piracy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Piracy</span></a> demanded to assure the future of <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/US" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>US</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a></p><p>OpenAI wants the US government to ensure it has access to any data it wants to train GenAI models, and to stop foreign countries from trying to enforce copyright rules against it and other American AI firms.</p><p><a href="https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/13/openai_data_copyright/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theregister.com/2025/03/13/ope</span><span class="invisible">nai_data_copyright/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/Theft" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Theft</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/USA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>USA</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/OpenAi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAi</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/Altman" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Altman</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ChatGPT</span></a></p>
Rachel E. S. Loesche<p>If I record myself reading a copyrighted book and share the recording with some friends (for free), is that copyright infringement?</p><p>If so, can I claim fair use by, idk, dressing up in a funny outfit or something and turning the reading into a performance art piece, which I then record and share?</p><p>Is it copyright infringement to extract the audio from said recording of such a performance art piece and share that? There must be a legal way to do this...</p><p><a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/FairUse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FairUse</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/AskFedi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AskFedi</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/HiveMind" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HiveMind</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/bookstodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bookstodon</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/audiobook" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>audiobook</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/art" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>art</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/FileSharing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FileSharing</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a></p>
jbz<p>“Wait, not like that”: Free and open access in the age of generative AI </p><p>｢ The true threat from AI models training on open access material is not that more people may access knowledge thanks to new modalities. It’s that those models may stifle Wikipedia and other free knowledge repositories, benefiting from the labor, money, and care that goes into supporting them while also bleeding them dry ｣</p><p><a href="https://www.citationneeded.news/free-and-open-access-in-the-age-of-generative-ai/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">citationneeded.news/free-and-o</span><span class="invisible">pen-access-in-the-age-of-generative-ai/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://indieweb.social/tags/ai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ai</span></a> <a href="https://indieweb.social/tags/genai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>genai</span></a> <a href="https://indieweb.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> <a href="https://indieweb.social/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://indieweb.social/tags/openaccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>openaccess</span></a></p>
COMMUNIA<p>Today, we made a submission to the EU Start-up and Scale-up Strategy call for evidence, focusing on <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyright</span></a> barriers to access to knowledge. 📈</p><p>Read our full submission here: ⤵️<br><a href="https://communia-association.org/2025/03/17/communias-submission-to-the-eu-start-up-and-scale-up-strategy-call-for-evidence/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">communia-association.org/2025/</span><span class="invisible">03/17/communias-submission-to-the-eu-start-up-and-scale-up-strategy-call-for-evidence/</span></a></p>
ExploreLive feeds
About